A few more indications from Planck satellite photo.
Since Planck satellite photos are the latest “facts” (and not theories) we have on the early universe, I feel that I have to concentrate on everything it can tell me. So I came back to it and this is what I went through:
Planck scientists told us that where the temperature was higher (red spots), there was a movement of “focalization” that we can interpret as an “effect of gravity”, and where were the colder spots (blue), there was an “effect of dispersion” which is the movement of the expansion.
So I choose a section of the photo where we have a maximum of both “effects” and I draw arrows to show the respective movement in each spots.
Finally, the majority of space-time (big bubbles) is "flat" since the beginning. And the small volumes of deformed space-time is deformed since 10^-32 sec (end of inflation).
One thing is quite surprising. Even if
the movements are contrary to each other, the “structure” of both types of temperature,
is the same. Both figures show more intensity in the middle of their “form”.
This is perfectly understandable since where you have the focussing effect, the red middle increases in density and where you have dispersion effect, the blue middle dilutes its intensity starting from the center.
The problem appears when you start thinking of what is actually the opinion of scientists who say that the “gravity” manifests itself in the whole of space-time. Which means that in the blue spot that dilutes its density, there is
a hidden manifestation of the red spot and behind the red spot there is a manifestation of the blue spot. Mathematic equations explain this as a possibility and scientists consider it as a “fact”.
But what we seen here is not the case
at all. What we see is that the blue spot is completely independent from the red spot and vice-versa. If we consider each spot as having their own metric of space-time, we have the red spots showing a decreasing metric and the blue spot showing an increasing metric. And it’s impossible to have decreasing and increasing metrics in the same volume of space-time.
If we really had a competition between those two “effects” in the metric of a volume of space-time, it would mean that
those effects appeared in the universe before its metric appeared; which is completely nonsense. The only explanation that makes sense is that gravity in the red spots has no effect whatsoever on the expansion of the blue spots. In other words,
gravity is not “universal” just as expansion is not “universal”. Where we have gravity we don’t have expansion and where we have expansion, we don’t have gravity. So gravity is “local” and, so is expansion.
This also brings another information. The red spots appeared in our universe
after the blue spots, since at the big bang there was only a manifestation of
radiative movement without any matter; so without any gravity; which means without any
space-time deformations. It also state that when gravitation appeared, it did it
bringing its own volume of space-time that was added to the actual space-time in expansion. Which resulted
in the inflation period caused by that “added” volume at 10^-36 sec and explains why inflation didn’t disturb expansion;
it didn’t apply to the same volume of space-time.
The result however is that where there’s expansion, that volume of space-time will expand exponentially faster than where there is gravity. Which will end by distributing matter, on a picture after 13 billion years of expansion, in filaments in regard of the big “bubbles” of space-time expanding where there’s no gravity. Consequently, matter distribution in filaments
is not a consequence of “gravity disturbances” but a consequence of the more rapid expansion of the volumes of “empty” space-time. And the regrouping of galaxies in clusters and super clusters is a consequence of the distribution of galaxies in filaments. Filaments are subjected to expansion but only from the level of galaxies cluster inclusively. From the level of galaxy down to the level of atom, expansion is absent. So, because the volume of space-time in filaments subjected to expansion is so small, in the overall picture, the rapidity of expansion of “empty” space-time, makes them appear as not expanding at all and even seem “collapsing”. But that is evidently a kind of optical illusion.