Serpent wrote:Here is a start:
Unless you are also in the top 0.01% of wealth and power, you are a member of an oppressed group, no matter how entitled and safe you feel. Consciously or unconsciously, you elevate some people as your superiors (i do mean elevate, because they would be nothing out of the ordinary without your support, without your assumption of inferiority) and you help to enforce their rule on the rest of the people. If you can work that out - recognize your position and function in the social scheme and see the mechanism of your own self-oppression and your oppression of others, then you get a clearer picture of their positions and some glimpse into their mind-set.
Then, look closely at the people near you: mother, nephew, friend, employee, neighbour - and think about their history. Try to place them on a mental diagram or grid (heck, draw a real one, why not?) of social relations. Listen for their estimate of self-worth from this new perspective, and give them opportunities to vent, and to depart from self-oppressive behaviours in your comforting. supportive presence.
** And then, ferchrissake do not abuse the power this will give you!!
mtbturtle wrote:ah ok Stockholm Syndrome - I think of Patty Hearst
CanadysPeak wrote:In sociology, and in psychology, there is a current theory about behavior by marginalized groups, called internalized oppression. I quote the least confrontational definition I find,
"In sociology and psychology, internalized oppression is the manner in which an oppressed group comes to use against itself the methods of the oppressor. For example, sometimes members of marginalized groups hold an oppressive view toward their own group, or start to believe in negative stereotypes of themselves.
For example, internalized racism is when members of Group A believe that the stereotypes of Group A are true and may believe that they are less intelligent or academically inferior to other groups of people.
Any social group can internalize prejudice." from A Celebration of Women
newyear wrote:CanadysPeak wrote:In sociology, and in psychology, there is a current theory about behavior by marginalized groups, called internalized oppression. I quote the least confrontational definition I find,
"In sociology and psychology, internalized oppression is the manner in which an oppressed group comes to use against itself the methods of the oppressor. For example, sometimes members of marginalized groups hold an oppressive view toward their own group, or start to believe in negative stereotypes of themselves.
For example, internalized racism is when members of Group A believe that the stereotypes of Group A are true and may believe that they are less intelligent or academically inferior to other groups of people.
Any social group can internalize prejudice." from A Celebration of Women
Good subject, Canadys. Are we to assume that when you refer to groups, they are organised and have an objective? Or, do you mean minority groups in general?
Created by Graydon Sheppard and Kyle Humphrey (and boosted by the star power of Juliette Lewis), “Shit Girls Say” went viral by taking a male perspective on common things “women” do and presenting it as humor. Internet forums filled with comments like “Omigod, all my friends do that” or “that is so me.” The sketch proved to be so popular, there are now three episodes, probably with more in the pipeline.
However, everyone wasn’t laughing at “Shit Girls Say.” Quite a few people noticed that the “girls” referred to in the top video were a certain type of woman, an experience that was not shared by all. Others noted that the humor that made the video funny was actually rooted in sexist stereotypes.
The challenge, and the discussion I invite, is how we in the hegemony can be strong, assured, and charitable without being oppressive, arrogant, and condescending. How can we give others the "safe space" to step away from internalized oppression? Could we really vote Tanya "not guilty"?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests