the_stoic wrote:I took a college logic & reasoning course a while back, and was taken aback by something new. A logic based not on syllogisms, or in otherwords, A, B, and C. I also learned about fallacies, and that the most logical argument is that which is with the fewest fallacies. I was confused because it seemed that there was no status quo to logic. Is this viewpoint valid, or is any argument which cannot be summed up in numbers not valid.
the_stoic wrote:I took a college logic & reasoning course a while back, and was taken aback by something new. A logic based not on syllogisms, or in otherwords, A, B, and C. I also learned about fallacies, and that the most logical argument is that which is with the fewest fallacies. I was confused because it seemed that there was no status quo to logic. Is this viewpoint valid, or is any argument which cannot be summed up in numbers not valid.
demasontoth wrote:A logical argument means demonstrating truth or false.
Fredd wrote:My reply just now to ornela in the "Demarcating logic" thread seems to address this question also, assuming "summed up in numbers" refers to logic as a branch of math as opposed to philosophical logic (or dialectical branch thereof).
flannel jesus wrote:demasontoth wrote:A logical argument means demonstrating truth or false.
You'd be closer if you replaced "truth or false" with "validity or invalidity".
Benzie wrote:Fredd wrote:My reply just now to ornela in the "Demarcating logic" thread seems to address this question also, assuming "summed up in numbers" refers to logic as a branch of math as opposed to philosophical logic (or dialectical branch thereof).
Isn't mathematics surely a branch of logic?
Fredd wrote:Benzie wrote:
Isn't mathematics surely a branch of logic?
Yes, that's the usual classification.
"Today, logic is both a branch of mathematics and a branch of philosophy." http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/
flannel jesus wrote:Fredd wrote:Benzie wrote:
Isn't mathematics surely a branch of logic?
Yes, that's the usual classification.
"Today, logic is both a branch of mathematics and a branch of philosophy." http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/ <unsnip> I liked that explanation for where I thought the exchange was leading, so adopted its terminology.
He asked if math was a branch of logic.
You said yes, but then you said that logic is a branch of math.
If logic is a branch of math, then the correct answer is "no."
Branching doesn't work both ways.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests