California textbook controversy over Hindu history

Discussions unearthing human history including cultural anthropology, linguistics, etc.

California textbook controversy over Hindu history

Postby wolfhnd on August 19th, 2011, 4:36 pm 

I'm curious if anyone has the expertise to comment on the Aryan migration theory for the origin of Sanskrit. The controversy itself is interesting as most scholars seem to favor this theory while nationalist in India find it repugnant.

After extensive further discussion of the Jewish, Christian, Muslim and Hindu edits by specialized scholars on 6 January 2006, and after several public SBE meetings, a decision was reached on 27 February 2006. After listening to 3 hours of public comment and after receiving 1500 pages of written comment, a five member panel of the Board adopted a recommendation of accepting the actions on the edits proposed by the staff of the California Department of Education (CDE).[19] The subcommittee approved some 70 changes but it rejected proposed major revisions from VF and HEF on monotheism, women's rights, the caste system and migration theories.[20]

On 8 March 2006, the full Board agreed with the February 27 decision, voting (9 to zero, 2 abstentions) to reaffirm only the changes approved on February 27, and to overturn the rest of the changes suggested by the HEF and VF, with two exceptions: the Aryan Migration Theory would be mentioned as 'disputed', and the Vedas would be referred to as sacred texts, rather than songs or poems. Most parties expressed qualified satisfaction with the decision; however, the Hindu American Foundation (HAF), that had not participated in the revisions, threatened the board with a lawsuit.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California ... du_history
wolfhnd
 


Return to Archaeology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests